18-YEAR OLD LEGAL CASE STUNS CHILD SUPPORT RESEARCHER
SHOWS ACES TRUE COLORS
Wednesday, February 24, 1999
Child support reform activist and legal researcher Lowell
Jaks, was dumbfounded when he stumbled across an 18-year old adoption case of none other
than Geraldine Jensen, the founder of ACES (Association for Children for Enforcement of
Support). "I was researching a custody case where a mother put her own children up
for adoption for the sole purpose of preventing her ex-husband from getting any visitation
rights. That was bad enough, but when I found out it was Geraldine Jensen, I was
absolutely stunned," Jaks said.
"Here is the founder of the most influential child support
advocacy groups in the country and shes refused money from her ex, violated numerous
court orders, moved 1,500 miles away with the children against court orders, stole
Christmas gifts her ex sent to the kids, wouldnt allow the children to visit with
their grandparents or talk on the phone to their dad and shes treated like
royalty. Politicians, judges - even Hollywood all came knocking on her door for
policy advice. Its absolutely incredible that her dark side was never exposed,"
added Mr. Jaks.
John Smith, a research analyst with ANCPR said, "Talk about the
fox guarding the hen house! It doesnt get much worse than this." Jensens
case (1981 WL 5460 (Ohio App. 6 Dist.) is posted on the Internet at
www.ancpr.org/jensen.htm. After winning her case in trial court, Jensen lost when her
ex-husband appealed. "People wonder why we have declining academic achievement and an
increase in youth crime when we let one parent essentially kidnap children just so they
can get revenge. Seeing this immature behavior really makes you wonder about the
politicians who have endorsed and adopted ACES policy recommendations lock, stock and
barrel," added Smith. One such politician is California Assemblyman Scott Wildman
whose website endorses ACES. Disneys ABC Television division teamed up with William
Morris to make a movie-of-the-week tribute to Geraldine Jensen which aired in 1998.
"You wont see any of the real-life court case facts even hinted at in the
movie. Shes slicker than teflon," Smith noted.
ACES sole focus is on collecting child support tax-free
money with no accountability required by the custodial parent as to how it gets spent.
"If money is so crucial to child well-being (which it isnt), why doesnt
ACES demand that custodial parents be required to document how the child support was
actually spent?" asks Jaks. A 1993 study in the Journal of Labor Economics reported
that only 20% of child support received is actually spent on the child. ANCPR is proposing
replacing child support and custody with shared parenting. "It will give kids what
they need: both parents. Government bureaucracies will shrink dramatically in size and
expense since the majority of parents will choose to raise their children instead of
paying child support," said Jaks. Smith noted, "The strongest support showing
that child support is unfair comes from radical feminist Karen Winner, who in her book
Divorced From Justice, writes There is accumulating evidence that men are
challenging their wives for custody of the children precisely because it is cheaper to
keep them than to pay child support. It doesnt get any clearer than
that."
######